<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ryan Block</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ryanblock.com/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ryanblock.com</link>
	<description>Ryan Block</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Yep, I&#8217;m leaving Engadget</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/07/yep-im-leaving-engadget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/07/yep-im-leaving-engadget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Company X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s true, my last day as Engadget&#8217;s editor-in-chief will be late next month (my official announcement is here).
Without question, this has been the hardest decision I&#8217;ve ever made, but I know it&#8217;s the right one. And as much as I&#8217;m looking forward to new challenges (and grateful they&#8217;re not Motorola-related),  I&#8217;m also really excited [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true, my last day as Engadget&#8217;s editor-in-chief will be late next month (<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/22/some-news-from-the-editors-desk/">my official announcement is here</a>).</p>
<p>Without question, this has been the hardest decision I&#8217;ve ever made, but I know it&#8217;s the right one. And as much as I&#8217;m looking forward to new challenges (and grateful they&#8217;re <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/06/motorolas-cellphone-business-needs-a-new-leader-okay-im-in/">not Motorola-related</a>),  I&#8217;m also really excited to see Engadget continue its evolution with <a href="http://www.joshuatopolsky.com/2008/07/22/ch-ch-changes/">Josh at the helm</a>, and as part of the AOL Tech network (where I&#8217;ll continue to play an advisory role as editor-at-large). <a href="http://peter.roj.as/">Pete</a> and I are both pretty happy with how things worked out, and are definitely looking ahead. (You&#8217;re <a href="http://twitter.com/ryanblock">following</a> us <a href="http://twitter.com/peterrojas">on Twitter</a>, right?)</p>
<p>As much as wish I could, for the time being I really can&#8217;t talk very much about the details of the new company (which does not yet have a name). I&#8217;m pretty stoked though &#8212; promise, you&#8217;ll hear more soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/07/yep-im-leaving-engadget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>30-inches: too much screen?</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/07/30-inches-too-much-screen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/07/30-inches-too-much-screen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[3007WFP-HC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[LCD]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[monitors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never thought I&#8217;d question it, but is 30-inches too much for one screen?
I&#8217;m a serious resolution and screen real estate hog, so I&#8217;ll let that sink in for a sec as I recount my week spent with a 30-incher I bought (and eventually sold) earlier this year. There&#8217;s no doubt that productivity goes up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought I&#8217;d question it, but is 30-inches too much for one screen?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a serious resolution and screen real estate hog, so I&#8217;ll let that sink in for a sec as I recount my week spent with a 30-incher I bought (and eventually sold) earlier this year. There&#8217;s no doubt that productivity goes up and stress goes down as you add more pixels to your desktop, and like many over the last ten years I&#8217;ve gone from 14 to 17 to 19-inch CRTs, to 20-inch LCDs, eventually to 24-inch, and more recently to 30-inches. I&#8217;m not going to get too into the <a href="http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&#038;l=en&#038;s=dhs&#038;cs=19&#038;sku=222-7175">Dell 3007WFP-HC</a> itself &#8212; which is absolutely amazing, and has color rich enough to make your eyes ache (in a good way) &#8212; but I could barely believe it when I discovered a display size that was simply too large for me to use comfortably.</p>
<p>Oh sure, I could fill up that amount of resolution easily. And since I&#8217;m not a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/25/macbook-air-review/">MacBook Air</a> user, actually powering that many pixels wasn&#8217;t really a problem. It all came down to the six inch jump, which necessitated dramatic eye movements from distantly adjacent windows, and, eventually, constant neck adjustments to reduce the strain of said looking back and forth.</p>
<p>Part of me thinks I&#8217;m crazy though, because I&#8217;d love nothing more than a wall of 30-inchers to work on. Guess I&#8217;ll have to check out those new <a href="http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Monitors/productdetail.aspx?c=us&#038;l=en&#038;s=dhs&#038;cs=19&#038;sku=223-9379">27-inch models</a> &#8212; too bad they only add size, and not pixels over the 24s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/07/30-inches-too-much-screen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who would you rather sit next to on a bus?</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/07/who-would-you-rather-sit-next-to-on-a-bus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/07/who-would-you-rather-sit-next-to-on-a-bus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Been pretty caught up over the last couple of weeks &#8212; especially in our iPhone 3G review and coverage &#8212; but one lasting memory I&#8217;m definitely going to take from 2008 is Bill&#8217;s last day at Microsoft. One Engadget commenter made a poignant remark that kind of brought it all home: Who would you rather [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been pretty caught up over the last couple of weeks &#8212; especially in our <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/07/11/iphone-3g-review/">iPhone 3G review</a> and coverage &#8212; but one lasting memory I&#8217;m definitely going to take from 2008 is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/28/bill-gates-day-wrap-up/">Bill&#8217;s last day at Microsoft</a>. One <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/27/celebrate-bill-gates-day-with-us/comments/12865579/">Engadget commenter</a> made a poignant remark that kind of brought it all home: Who would you rather sit next to on a bus, Bill or Steve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/07/who-would-you-rather-sit-next-to-on-a-bus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That rumor going around today</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/07/that-rumor-going-around-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/07/that-rumor-going-around-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, looks like my man Mike finally found occasion to write about me (little does he know, I&#8217;ve spent years plotting my way onto TechCrunch). Granted, I&#8217;m not commenting on that (or any) rumors about my career and future, but it&#8217;s never a bad thing to have people interested, right? It&#8217;s certainly a lot better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, looks like my man <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/01/engadgets-ryan-block-and-peter-rojas-to-team-on-new-startup/">Mike finally found occasion to write about me</a> (little does he know, I&#8217;ve spent years plotting my way onto TechCrunch). Granted, I&#8217;m not commenting on that (or any) rumors about my career and future, but it&#8217;s never a bad thing to have people interested, right? It&#8217;s certainly a lot better than the alternative.</p>
<p>What I will say &#8212; and it&#8217;s the same thing I told Mike earlier today &#8212; is that, as I enter my fifth year at Engadget, I&#8217;m still totally focused on it, our team, and living up to the enormous level of trust our readers place in us day in and out. (As I&#8217;m sure <a href="http://www.veronicabelmont.com">Veronica</a> would tell you, I&#8217;m probably actually <em>too</em> focused.) I can also say that I had no idea until today that I owned 39+ domain names, but that&#8217;s pretty awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/07/that-rumor-going-around-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Veronica profiled in August issue of PlayStation Mag</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/veronica-profiled-in-august-issue-of-playstation-mag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/veronica-profiled-in-august-issue-of-playstation-mag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PlayStation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Qore]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Veronica Belmont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice, Veronica was profiled in the August issue of PlayStation: The Official Magazine! I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s on newsstands yet, but I can&#8217;t wait to give it a read. Photo from V&#8217;s Flickr.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="imgtop" title="veronica-profile" src="http://www.ryanblock.com/wp/files/veronica-profile.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="350" />Nice, <a href="http://www.veronicabelmont.com">Veronica</a> was profiled in the August issue of PlayStation: The Official Magazine! I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s on newsstands yet, but I can&#8217;t wait to give it a read. Photo from V&#8217;s <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/earlysound/2591193026/">Flickr</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/veronica-profiled-in-august-issue-of-playstation-mag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maybe we&#8217;ll pay you, AP, if you pay us</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/maybe-well-pay-you-ap-if-you-pay-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/maybe-well-pay-you-ap-if-you-pay-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of all the AP quotation commentary floating around in the last week, I think possibly the most effective point came from [edit] a certain well-known conservative author [/edit] who, by the AP&#8217;s own scale, claims she&#8217;s &#8220;owed&#8221; some $130k for unauthorized quotes and excerpts from her blog. Clearly, if the AP wants to impose these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the AP quotation commentary floating around in the last week, I think possibly the most effective point came from [edit] a certain well-known conservative author [/edit] who, by the AP&#8217;s own scale, claims she&#8217;s &#8220;owed&#8221; some $130k for unauthorized quotes and excerpts from her blog. Clearly, if the AP wants to impose these totally arbitrary rules on others, it&#8217;d better be prepared to live by them itself. (And let&#8217;s not even get into the irony of the AP accepting free, in-the-field breaking news submissions from &#8220;citizen journalists.&#8221;)</p>
<p>It seems like life in the (rapidly shrinking) print bubble has severely distorted the AP&#8217;s outlook in the midst of an increasingly predominent all-digital media landscape. If I were them I&#8217;d be careful in the coming weeks and months &#8212; unlike the print pubs that syndicate their news, there isn&#8217;t any real need for the AP on the internet, and at this rate I&#8217;m not sure they&#8217;ll be missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/maybe-well-pay-you-ap-if-you-pay-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joystiq turns four!</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/joystiq-turns-four/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/joystiq-turns-four/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Joystiq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hard to believe Joystiq is four years old today! I remember the old days with Pete and Ben Zackheim (who&#8217;s actually still in the AOL Games family), working to get it off the ground, helping fill in stories for Joystiq between posts on Engadget. Four bits of Joystiq trivia:

Joystiq&#8217;s first E3 (Engadget&#8217;s second) is where [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to believe <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2004/06/16/introducing-joystiq/">Joystiq is four years old today</a>! I remember the old days with Pete and Ben Zackheim (who&#8217;s actually still in the AOL Games family), working to get it off the ground, helping fill in stories for Joystiq between posts on Engadget. Four bits of Joystiq trivia:</p>
<ul>
<li>Joystiq&#8217;s first E3 (Engadget&#8217;s second) is where we all brainstormed with Cat Schwartz on the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/08/31/video-engadget-starring-cat-schwartz-ds-vs-psp/">infamous DS vs. PSP video</a>.</li>
<li>The following E3, former co-editor Vlad Cole (now at Microsoft) was writing a book on all-Pizza diets. This, of course, meant Engadget and Joystiq editors all wound up eating basically only pizza. Not sure I&#8217;ve ever lost the weight.</li>
<li>James Ransom-Wiley has been with Joystiq since early July 2004, making him the longest-tenured editor there. Go James!</li>
<li>Contrary to popular belief, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/04/technology/04blog.html">Kotaku actually started in October of 2004</a>, seemingly as a response to Joystiq.</li>
</ul>
<p>My favorite trade show of the year is usually E3 &#8212; partly because it means we get to regroup with Joystiq and do it up together. Looking forward to that next month, and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/16/happy-4th-birthday-joystiq/">happy birthday Joystiq</a>!</p>
<p><strong>Bonus trivia:</strong> Last E3 myself, Chris, and Pete were all ticketed for jaywalking &#8212; at a crosswalk. For some reason my ticket was withdrawn, but Pete and Chris still had to pay theirs. Pics or it didn&#8217;t happen, right? <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/barb/831461214/">Here</a> you <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/barb/830602799/in/set-72157600880962806/">go</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/joystiq-turns-four/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leica&#8217;s pixel dog</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/leicas-pixel-dog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/leicas-pixel-dog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pixels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I had a dog, it would absolutely have to be this breed. [Via Core 77 and Comunicadores]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="imgtop" title="pixel-dog" src="http://www.ryanblock.com/wp/files/pixel-dog.jpg" alt="" />If I had a dog, it would absolutely have to be this breed. [Via <a href="http://www.core77.com/blog/object_culture/leica_dlux_3_pixel_dog_10135.asp">Core 77</a> and <a href="http://comunicadores.info/2008/06/11/leica-d-lux-3-dog-pixel/">Comunicadores</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/leicas-pixel-dog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest day ever</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/biggest-day-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/biggest-day-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3G]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[WWDC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is Engadget.
This is Engadget when Apple launches a new iPhone. Any questions?
Thanks again to everyone who stopped by today to read our coverage of the iPhone 3G launch &#8212; it&#8217;s always an extraordinary amount of fun and a real honor to be the go-to place for big news in the gadget world.
And yes, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.ryanblock.com/wp/files/engadget-reg.jpg" alt="" title="engadget-reg" class="imgtop" />This is Engadget.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.ryanblock.com/wp/files/engadget-apple-event.jpg" alt="" title="engadget-apple-event" class="imgtop" />This is Engadget when Apple launches a new iPhone. Any questions?</p>
<p>Thanks again to everyone who stopped by today to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/09/steve-jobs-keynote-live-from-wwdc-2008/">read our coverage</a> of the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/09/iphone-3g-is-finally-official/">iPhone 3G</a> launch &#8212; it&#8217;s always an extraordinary amount of fun and a real honor to be the go-to place for big news in the gadget world.</p>
<p>And yes, I was fortunate enough to play with it and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/09/iphone-3g-hands-on/">definitely can&#8217;t wait to really put the spurs to one</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/biggest-day-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Page one!</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/page-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/page-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 23:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excuse me for a moment of self indulgence here, but I noticed my search referrers were going up for my first name &#8212; and as it turns out, I&#8217;ve gone from page two to page one (number ten, to be exact) for &#8220;ryan.&#8221; Okay, I know it&#8217;s nothing compared to Veronica, who claims the number [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.ryanblock.com/wp/files/ryan-page-1.jpg" alt="" title="ryan-page-1" class="imgtop" />Excuse me for a moment of self indulgence here, but I noticed my search referrers were going up for my first name &#8212; and as it turns out, I&#8217;ve gone from page two to page one (number ten, to be exact) for &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?&#038;q=ryan">ryan</a>.&#8221; Okay, I know it&#8217;s nothing compared to <a href="http://www.google.com/search?&#038;q=veronica">Veronica</a>, who claims the number one spot for her name, but watch your back, Ryan Adams, because number nine is only a matter of time now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/page-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qore is go!</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/qore-is-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/qore-is-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PS3]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Qore]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Veronica Belmont]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Veronica&#8217;s big, long awaited, heretofore secret project Qore launched for download last night &#8212; we grabbed it this morning to see how the final version looks. Very hot. And I&#8217;m not just saying that, because, well, you know. Also, I&#8217;m declaring myself the first (ok, maybe second) to have unearthed the Qore easter egg: press [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="imgtop" title="qore-veronica" src="http://www.ryanblock.com/wp/files/qore-veronica.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="269" />Veronica&#8217;s big, long awaited, heretofore secret project <a href="http://www.veronicabelmont.com/2008/06/introducing-qore/">Qore</a> launched for download last night &#8212; we grabbed it this morning to see how the final version looks. Very hot. And I&#8217;m not just saying that, because, well, you know. Also, I&#8217;m declaring myself the first (ok, maybe <a href="http://www.ps3fanboy.com/photos/qore/845825/">second</a>) to have unearthed the Qore easter egg: press L2 from the home screen and you get taken to a mini-game called Death Orb. More from <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2008/06/06/peering-into-the-depths-of-qore/">Joystiq</a> and <a href="http://www.ps3fanboy.com/2008/06/05/american-psn-releases-for-june-5th/">PS3 Fanboy</a>, and <a href="http://www.veronicabelmont.com/2008/06/questions-and-qomments-see-what-i-did-there/">Veronica</a>; Death Orb shot after the break.<span id="more-861"></span></p>
<p><img class="imgtop" title="qore-death-orb" src="http://www.ryanblock.com/wp/files/qore-death-orb.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="279" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/qore-is-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joy of Tech brings me joy</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/joy-of-tech-brings-me-joy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/joy-of-tech-brings-me-joy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 05:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Engadget]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[comics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Joy of Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know Steve is a daily Engadget reader, but I never fully understood why until now.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.ryanblock.com/wp/files/joy-of-tech-engadget.jpg" alt="" title="joy-of-tech-engadget" width="480" height="478" class="imgtop" />I know Steve is a daily Engadget reader, but I never fully <a href="http://www.geekculture.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1114.html">understood why until now</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/joy-of-tech-brings-me-joy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mentoring the next generation of gadget bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/mentoring-the-next-generation-of-gadget-bloggers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/mentoring-the-next-generation-of-gadget-bloggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TeenTechBlog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late last year Peter and I began a mentorship program with some students of the Torah Academy of Bergen County; Eli, Chaim, and later Charlie and Tzvi got together to begin writing an editing a gadget blog aimed at teenagers casually interested in technology, dubbed the TeenTechBlog. These kids have definitely made a lot of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late last year <a href="http://peter.roj.as">Peter</a> and I began a mentorship program with some students of the Torah Academy of Bergen County; Eli, Chaim, and later Charlie and Tzvi got together to begin writing an editing a gadget blog aimed at teenagers casually interested in technology, dubbed the <a href="http://teentechblog.com/">TeenTechBlog</a>. These kids have definitely made a lot of progress over the past six months. Starting a site and following it through isn&#8217;t as easy as it looks, and they&#8217;ve have been continually upping their game despite their demanding school schedule.</p>
<p>I think the question I&#8217;m most often asked by people not already in the industry is, &#8220;How do I break into writing about technology?&#8221; The answer is pretty simple: start writing, keep writing (even when the initial luster has worn off, even if you&#8217;re not collecting droves of readers and scads of review units), and with any luck you&#8217;ll hone your skill and catch your break &#8212; not unlike the path the crew at TeenTechBlog are already on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/06/mentoring-the-next-generation-of-gadget-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Annoying habits&#8221; ad irony</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/annoying-habits-ad-irony/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/annoying-habits-ad-irony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 03:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PC World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
You know, if you&#8217;re going to do a feature called &#8220;The 10 Most Annoying Habits of Technology Companies&#8221;, you&#8217;d do best to vet your own site first &#8212; especially the page dedicated to annoying advertising.
Although to be fair, they do disclaim being guilty of the same, and I&#8217;m sure the site&#8217;s editorial staff doesn&#8217;t approve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.ryanblock.com/wp/files/pc-world-ad-irony.jpg" alt="" title="pc-world-ad-irony" class="imgtop" /><br />
You know, if you&#8217;re going to do a feature called &#8220;The 10 Most Annoying Habits of Technology Companies&#8221;, you&#8217;d do best to <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,146201-page,8-c,consumeradvice/article.html">vet your own site first</a> &#8212; especially the page dedicated to annoying advertising.</p>
<p>Although to be fair, they do disclaim being guilty of the same, and I&#8217;m sure the site&#8217;s editorial staff doesn&#8217;t approve of that kind of advertising nor want it on the site. Trust me, I understand as well as any editor that the people making the content don&#8217;t always have much or any say in how their property advertises &#8212; but that&#8217;s both a double-edged sword and a conversation for another time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/annoying-habits-ad-irony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good folders to exclude from Time Machine backups</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Time Machine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time Machine is a really effective tool for backing up everything on your drive. And when I say everything, I mean it &#8212; Time Machine indiscriminately backs up a lot of junk on your drive. And because of the techniques it uses and the way some files are used by your apps, you might find [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.ryanblock.com/wp/files/time-machine-icon.jpg" alt="" title="time-machine-icon" class="imgright" />Time Machine is a really effective tool for backing up everything on your drive. And when I say everything, I mean it &#8212; Time Machine indiscriminately backs up a lot of junk on your drive. And because of the techniques it uses and the way some files are used by your apps, you might find that your 500GB external backup drive is getting full after just a few months of use.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really easy to identify folders for exclusion from Time Machine, which will save time and space during backups. It&#8217;s worth noting, though, that if your machine&#8217;s drive does fail, you won&#8217;t be able to execute a full restore without having some of these locations backed up. Then again, if you&#8217;re anything like me, you&#8217;re far more likely to just do a full reinstall and just restore your lost user data. (Doing a full restore from backup just doesn&#8217;t have many advantages compared to a full system reinstall, anyway.)</p>
<p>These are just a few <em>suggestions</em> &#8212; you should NEVER exclude anything from backup if you&#8217;re unsure you have another copy, aren&#8217;t able to get it again, or are unaware of the possible ramifications. Of course, you&#8217;ve got any good folders you think should be added to the list, feel free to drop &#8216;em in comments.</p>
<p><strong>Obvious</strong><br />
The duh stuff.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>/Applications</strong> - This will likely save you more space than any other single folder, especially if you have lots of apps. Just make sure you know what programs you&#8217;d want to get back if your machine were to die.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Caches and downloads</strong><br />
Big directories of files that should probably be excluded automatically, but aren&#8217;t. Unless you&#8217;re a crazy developer debugging code, you&#8217;ll probably never need a backup of your caches.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>/Users/[user]/Library/Caches</strong> and <strong>/Library/Caches</strong> - Between the two you can knock off a few hundred megs of constantly changing, essentially useless data.</li>
<li><strong>/Users/[user]/Downloads</strong> - Where all your internet downloads wind up. Frequently changes, and if you&#8217;re anything like me, it&#8217;s filled with gigs of garbage.</li>
<li><strong>/Users/[user]/.Trash</strong> and <strong>/.Trashes</strong> - Some people might see value in backing up their trashed files. Not I.</li>
</ul>
<p>More after the break.<span id="more-847"></span></p>
<p><strong>Audio and media</strong><br />
Some more obvious picks. You probably don&#8217;t need to back this stuff up.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>/Library/Audio</strong> - You can save from the hundreds of megs to gigs here. Keep an eye out for the GarageBand samples, they weigh a ton.</li>
<li><strong>/Users/[user]/Music/iTunes/iTunes Music/Podcasts</strong> - I don&#8217;t really re-listen to podcasts, but even if I did, they can be re-downloaded easily. So the 3GB+ I save here is a no brainer.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Time Machine un-friendly apps</strong><br />
The data produced by some of these apps can easily be the worst offenders when it comes to backups. Until they get their act together, they should likely be excluded categorically.</p>
<ul>
<li>Parallels (<strong>/Users/[user]/Library/Parallels</strong>) and VMware (<strong>/Users/[user]/Documents/Virtual Machines</strong>)- You&#8217;ll definitely want to keep a copy of your virtual machines, but if left included in Time Machine backups, your system will continuously save the virtual disks each time you use Parallels or VMware. (VMware has become a little more TM-aware though, which is good.) That means potentially hundreds of wasted GB &#8212; not to mention tons of lost time during backup.</li>
<li>Entourage (<strong>/Users/[user]/Documents/Microsoft User Data/Office 2008 Identities</strong>) - Same deal here, Entourage uses one giant, constantly changing file to store all your mail. It sucks not to have your email backed up though, so be sure to use something other than Time Machine for keeping a copy handy in case of emergency.</li>
<li><strong>/Users/[user]/Library/Mail Downloads</strong> - Whenever you open an attachment in Mail, it stores a copy of the file in your Mail.app attachments folder. If you&#8217;re a heavy Mail user, excluding this will save you some real space.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>System</strong><br />
Beware! You likely won&#8217;t screw up anything by excluding this stuff, but if you run into trouble these are some pretty important folders. Note: you&#8217;ll need to hit &#8220;show invisible items&#8221; to exclude some of these.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>/usr</strong>, <strong>/sbin</strong>, <strong>/private</strong>, <strong>/bin</strong> - Collectively contain about a billion essential system files that can ultimately just be reinstalled in case of disaster.</li>
<li><strong>/system</strong> - Root system folder. Contains lots of essential stuff &#8212; gigs of it, in fact. Great place to save space.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Twittering mean you blog less? The answer might surprise you.</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/does-twittering-mean-you-blog-less-the-answer-might-surprise-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/does-twittering-mean-you-blog-less-the-answer-might-surprise-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[microblogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other Twitter-related post I&#8217;ve been wanting to write lately regards the correlation between the decline of &#8220;regular&#8221; blogging (which I&#8217;m now referring to as macroblogging), and microblogging (specifically, Twittering). Ask anyone with a blog that also spends time Twittering, and they&#8217;ll likely tell you that as their microblogging has gone up, their macroblogging has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other <a href="http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/microblogging-needs-platform-independence/">Twitter-related post</a> I&#8217;ve been wanting to write lately regards the correlation between the decline of &#8220;regular&#8221; blogging (which I&#8217;m now referring to as macroblogging), and microblogging (specifically, Twittering). Ask anyone with a blog that also spends time Twittering, and they&#8217;ll likely tell you that as their microblogging has gone up, their macroblogging has gone down. That&#8217;s definitely been my take &#8212; I&#8217;ve been Twittering a lot more in the last six months, and I feel like it&#8217;s has a substantial impact on the volume of posting on my personal site.</p>
<p>So I decided to plot the numbers to prove the theory that Twittering was, in fact, causing my personal blogging to atrophy. I had a very clear image in my head of what the two lines would look like: the blog would be trending down ever so slowly, taking nosedives during busy months, while the Twitter line would be going up pretty fast. So you can imagine my utter surprise when I hit the render chart button and the following showed up.<span id="more-841"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://www.ryanblock.com/wp/files/blog-vs-twitter.jpg" alt="" title="blog-vs-twitter" class="imgtop" /></p>
<p>Although it&#8217;s obvious that my microblogging activity has exploded over the past few months, I absolutely was not expecting to find that as each activity goes up or down, the other almost always moves with it in parallel. Clearly it&#8217;s not always directly proportional (as most dramatically evidenced in this March&#8217;s spike), but that&#8217;s easily attributed to the ease and speed of microblogging vs. writing a full blog post &#8212; which is probably what led to the assumption that one affected the other in the first place.</p>
<p>So totally counter to that intuition, it would seem that, at least in my case, microblogging and blogging are not at all in opposition. If anything, both are probably just tied to the total amount of free time I have at my disposal. Hopefully others will chart their respective micro/macroblogging output so we can see if this revised theory of blog-atrophy actually holds true.</p>
<p>P.S. -Big ups to <a href="http://twitterholic.com/">Twitterholic</a> for <s>spying</s> keeping track of everybody&#8217;s Twitter usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/does-twittering-mean-you-blog-less-the-answer-might-surprise-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microblogging needs platform independence</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/microblogging-needs-platform-independence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/microblogging-needs-platform-independence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[microblogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I&#8217;m fairly ill-equipped to delve deep into burgeoning distributed social networking &#8220;standards&#8221;, there are some clear trends in play pointing toward the need for microblogging to become a platform independent activity. (The multiple Twitter outages over the last week are only the icing on this cake.)
Although blogging can trace its roots to zine / [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#8217;m fairly ill-equipped to delve deep into burgeoning distributed social networking &#8220;standards&#8221;, there are some clear trends in play pointing toward the need for microblogging to become a platform independent activity. (The multiple Twitter outages over the last week are only the icing on this cake.)</p>
<p>Although blogging can trace its roots to zine / underground publishing culture, it wasn&#8217;t until the first blog CMSs landed in 1999 and 2000 (like Blogger and Movable Type) that mainstream audiences experimented with self-publishing. Those blogging at the time might remember what a highly platform-based experience it was. RSS and other forms of one:any (not just one:many) aggregation hadn&#8217;t yet come into widespread use, meaning some of those early platforms fed right back into their own siloed communities. This was especially apparent in the case of LiveJournal, which was really popular back then. Way late to RSS, LiveJournal instead relied on a light social networking system that aggregated posts to groups of friends using the service. Sounds familiar. Of course, blogging eventually grew up and out of its early stages into something far more horizontal and platform independent, ensuring the activity of blogging didn&#8217;t tie users to just one system and set of relationships.</p>
<p>Although Twitter should be clearly wary of users eventually fleeing for a distributed, decentralized, relationship-based cloud of microblogging, I think most in the know would agree that ultimately it&#8217;s what the medium needs to make the next step. Because of Twitter&#8217;s dependence on relationships, though, that transition probably won&#8217;t come easily; perhaps that&#8217;s where services like FriendFeed and other meta-aggregators step in as the glue for disparate, distributed life-content apps. Or perhaps that&#8217;s the tack Twitter needs to build into its own business, ensuring it makes the transition from early platform to future technology leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/microblogging-needs-platform-independence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ownership rundown: who owns who in tech pubs</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/ownership-rundown-who-owns-who-in-tech-pubs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/ownership-rundown-who-owns-who-in-tech-pubs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of media buys going down lately &#8212; some solid, others a little harder to see. But for better or worse, in the last couple of years the new media market&#8217;s definitely trending heavily on the corporate-acquired end of things. Just for grins, let&#8217;s take a quick look at who owns who. Note: this is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of media buys going down lately &#8212; some solid, others a little harder to see. But for better or worse, in the last couple of years the new media market&#8217;s definitely trending heavily on the corporate-acquired end of things. Just for grins, let&#8217;s take a quick look at who owns who. Note: this is by no means an exhaustive list (nor does it include aggregators like Techmeme or Digg), just a few of the popular editor editor-driven tech sites on my radar.</p>
<p><strong>Owned</strong><br />
Ars Technica - CondéNet (Condé Nast)<br />
Crave - CNET (CBS)<br />
Engadget - AOL (Time Warner)<br />
Slashdot - SourceForge, Inc.<br />
Wired blogs (Danger Room, Epicenter, etc.) - CondéNet (Condé Nast)</p>
<p><strong>Independent</strong><br />
BoingBoing - Happy Mutants, LLC<br />
GigaOM - GigaOmni Media<br />
Gizmodo - Gawker Media<br />
PaidContent - ContentNext Media, Inc.<br />
Silicon Alley Insider - Silicon Alley Insider, Inc<br />
TechCrunch - Interserve, Inc.<br />
VentureBeat - VentureBeat, Inc.</p>
<p><strong>Independent, on hire</strong><br />
Fake Steve Jobs - Forbes<br />
Scobleizer - FastCompany (Mansueto Ventures, LLC)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/ownership-rundown-who-owns-who-in-tech-pubs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry McCracken leaving to start a new site</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/harry-mccracken-leaving-to-start-a-new-site/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/harry-mccracken-leaving-to-start-a-new-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Harry McCracken]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Harry McCracken is leaving PC World on June 2nd to start his own tech site. The man&#8217;s a titan in our industry, I can&#8217;t wait to check out what he&#8217;s got cooking &#8212; good luck, Harry!
P.S. -And no, the EIC gig I referenced the other day wasn&#8217;t this, so there you go.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So <a href="http://blogs.pcworld.com/techlog/archives/006938.html">Harry McCracken is leaving PC World</a> on June 2nd to start his own tech site. The man&#8217;s a titan in our industry, I can&#8217;t wait to check out what he&#8217;s got cooking &#8212; good luck, Harry!</p>
<p>P.S. -And no, the <a href="http://twitter.com/ryanblock/statuses/801233303">EIC gig I referenced the other day</a> wasn&#8217;t this, so there you go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/harry-mccracken-leaving-to-start-a-new-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote from Helvetica</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/04/quote-from-helvetica/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/04/quote-from-helvetica/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 07:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Etc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As a type geek took me longer than I&#8217;d like to admit to catch Helvetica (the movie), but there was definitely one quote by Lars Müller about the quaint ubiquity of the modern world&#8217;s &#8220;default&#8221; typeface that stuck with me: &#8220;What I like is that this very serious typeface tells you the dos and don&#8217;ts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.ryanblock.com/wp/files/helvetica-cafe.jpg" alt="" title="helvetica-cafe" width="400" height="268" class="imgtop" /><br />
As a type geek took me longer than I&#8217;d like to admit to catch <a href="http://www.helveticafilm.com/">Helvetica (the movie)</a>, but there was definitely one quote by <a href="http://www.lars-mueller-publishers.com/">Lars Müller</a> about the quaint ubiquity of the modern world&#8217;s &#8220;default&#8221; typeface that stuck with me: &#8220;What I like is that this very serious typeface tells you the dos and don&#8217;ts of sweet life &#8212; it must be Helvetica.&#8221; [Photo by <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/marcosdopico/355019681/">Marcos Dopico</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/04/quote-from-helvetica/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.855 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
