<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s on first? iPod nano, that&#8217;s who.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/</link>
	<description>Editor and technology critic in the midst of founding a new content startup.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/comment-page-1/#comment-112027</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=1249#comment-112027</guid>
		<description>Either one looks fine to me but as long as my gen 1 nano and my iPhone keep working I probably won't be buying any iPods. I also have a gen 3 iPod which I don't use often. If they bring a 60+ Touch at the right price then I might consider buying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either one looks fine to me but as long as my gen 1 nano and my iPhone keep working I probably won&#8217;t be buying any iPods. I also have a gen 3 iPod which I don&#8217;t use often. If they bring a 60+ Touch at the right price then I might consider buying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Poll: iPod Abbott vs. iPod Costello&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/comment-page-1/#comment-112017</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Poll: iPod Abbott vs. iPod Costello&#160;&#124;&#160;Technologizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=1249#comment-112017</guid>
		<description>[...] Here are the two candidates&#8211;that&#8217;s the new guy on the left, of course. (Abbott and Costello metaphor used in headline stolen from Ryan Block.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here are the two candidates&#8211;that&#8217;s the new guy on the left, of course. (Abbott and Costello metaphor used in headline stolen from Ryan Block.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul TS Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/comment-page-1/#comment-111989</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul TS Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=1249#comment-111989</guid>
		<description>Alternately:

* Laurel and Hardy
* Jack Sprat &#38; Wife

and the geek favorite

* C3PO and R2D2

Also, looking forward to the next gdgtcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alternately:</p>
<p>* Laurel and Hardy<br />
* Jack Sprat &amp; Wife</p>
<p>and the geek favorite</p>
<p>* C3PO and R2D2</p>
<p>Also, looking forward to the next gdgtcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Queco Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/comment-page-1/#comment-111987</link>
		<dc:creator>Queco Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 04:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=1249#comment-111987</guid>
		<description>That would only work if they included a video of the skit... they could, maybe, get away with just including the audio... on everyone shipped (in the US at least).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would only work if they included a video of the skit&#8230; they could, maybe, get away with just including the audio&#8230; on everyone shipped (in the US at least).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Singer</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/comment-page-1/#comment-111985</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 04:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=1249#comment-111985</guid>
		<description>haha!
yeah, because I'm in between older generations and younger ones, I still get it. ... barely, but I know my parents would have liked that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha!<br />
yeah, because I&#8217;m in between older generations and younger ones, I still get it. &#8230; barely, but I know my parents would have liked that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urkel</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/comment-page-1/#comment-111977</link>
		<dc:creator>Urkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=1249#comment-111977</guid>
		<description>From the individual shots the 4G Nano screen looked big so I'm surprised it's the exact same size as the 3G. I do like the way you hold it sideways but I really wish there was a way to disable that obnoxious coverflow. I'd prefer to see a list view that went across the screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the individual shots the 4G Nano screen looked big so I&#8217;m surprised it&#8217;s the exact same size as the 3G. I do like the way you hold it sideways but I really wish there was a way to disable that obnoxious coverflow. I&#8217;d prefer to see a list view that went across the screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/comment-page-1/#comment-111971</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=1249#comment-111971</guid>
		<description>I'm kind of miffed Apple isn't considering firmware upgrades for the 3g Nano since the 4g and 3g Nano are essentially the same IPod. Especially since they are considering allowing it with the last gen Classic models. 

That's Apple for ya though. Need to get their hardware numbers up by forcing you to upgrade your hardware for marginal feature upgrades...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kind of miffed Apple isn&#8217;t considering firmware upgrades for the 3g Nano since the 4g and 3g Nano are essentially the same IPod. Especially since they are considering allowing it with the last gen Classic models. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s Apple for ya though. Need to get their hardware numbers up by forcing you to upgrade your hardware for marginal feature upgrades&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/comment-page-1/#comment-111963</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=1249#comment-111963</guid>
		<description>Or Fat Man and Little Boy ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or Fat Man and Little Boy &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/comment-page-1/#comment-111951</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=1249#comment-111951</guid>
		<description>I was thinking Blues Brothers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking Blues Brothers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Block</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/comment-page-1/#comment-111945</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=1249#comment-111945</guid>
		<description>Hm, yeah, nothing embarrassing about THAT error. Thanks for the heads up. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, yeah, nothing embarrassing about THAT error. Thanks for the heads up. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tacit Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/comment-page-1/#comment-111943</link>
		<dc:creator>Tacit Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=1249#comment-111943</guid>
		<description>Um, Ryan...Costello was the short, fat one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Ryan&#8230;Costello was the short, fat one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vectr</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/09/whos-on-first-ipod-nano-thats-who/comment-page-1/#comment-111937</link>
		<dc:creator>vectr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=1249#comment-111937</guid>
		<description>That would have been admitting the nano 'fatty' looked bad in adverts (even though it was a cute little device in real life).  
  
It would also have slapped current nano users in the face. Probably not a good option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would have been admitting the nano &#8216;fatty&#8217; looked bad in adverts (even though it was a cute little device in real life).  </p>
<p>It would also have slapped current nano users in the face. Probably not a good option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
