<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good folders to exclude from Time Machine backups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/</link>
	<description>Editor and technology critic in the midst of founding a new content startup.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1-10026</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scot</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-112321</link>
		<dc:creator>scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-112321</guid>
		<description>I just started using time machine, and for the life of me can not figure out why I have 220 gigs on it when I only have about 30 on my hard drive on my imac, todaty I clicked back up now since some how the last was interuppted and it shows its backing up 85 more gb's.  Does it just back up whats new or every thing every time, seems redundant doesnt it. Please help my 1tb external will be filled in a week or so at this rate and I dont ever even get close to the 250 gb in my imac. as far as prefrences I cant seem to get to them for time machine.  Scot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just started using time machine, and for the life of me can not figure out why I have 220 gigs on it when I only have about 30 on my hard drive on my imac, todaty I clicked back up now since some how the last was interuppted and it shows its backing up 85 more gb&#8217;s.  Does it just back up whats new or every thing every time, seems redundant doesnt it. Please help my 1tb external will be filled in a week or so at this rate and I dont ever even get close to the 250 gb in my imac. as far as prefrences I cant seem to get to them for time machine.  Scot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdb</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-112065</link>
		<dc:creator>jdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-112065</guid>
		<description>Time Machine does not, in fact back up everything.  The list of standard exclusions is here:

/System/Library/CoreServices/backupd.bundle/Contents/Resources/StdExclusions.plist

including some of the things you mention in the article.  So manually adding caches and trashes is pointless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time Machine does not, in fact back up everything.  The list of standard exclusions is here:</p>
<p>/System/Library/CoreServices/backupd.bundle/Contents/Resources/StdExclusions.plist</p>
<p>including some of the things you mention in the article.  So manually adding caches and trashes is pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ N-4ceR</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-111503</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ N-4ceR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 07:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-111503</guid>
		<description>Removing the caches made the thing! I saved almost 1 GB of space.
Thank you, mate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Removing the caches made the thing! I saved almost 1 GB of space.<br />
Thank you, mate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aashay</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-111233</link>
		<dc:creator>Aashay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-111233</guid>
		<description>Excellent tips Ryan!  It's weird, I just got my Mac and decided Time Machine would be useful, but I couldn't make up my mind on what to back up.  I started haphazardly googling for pointers, assuming I wouldn't find anything concise...but lo and behold! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent tips Ryan!  It&#8217;s weird, I just got my Mac and decided Time Machine would be useful, but I couldn&#8217;t make up my mind on what to back up.  I started haphazardly googling for pointers, assuming I wouldn&#8217;t find anything concise&#8230;but lo and behold! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shakil</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-111221</link>
		<dc:creator>Shakil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-111221</guid>
		<description>Man, can't thank you enough for the tips. Backing up 32GB+ data everytime I touched parallels was making me going crazy. Keep up the good work mate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, can&#8217;t thank you enough for the tips. Backing up 32GB+ data everytime I touched parallels was making me going crazy. Keep up the good work mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuning Time Machine &#124; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-111217</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuning Time Machine &#124; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-111217</guid>
		<description>[...] Just about everything Ryan Block suggests [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just about everything Ryan Block suggests [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-111105</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-111105</guid>
		<description>I am wondering if it shouldn't be the reverse, i.e.
tell time machine to "include" specific folders (data) and not backup anything else. If the HDD gets hosed, i 'll reinstall from scratch. The only thing i cant reinstall is my personal data.

How does time-machine gen its backup list ? Is it an exclude or an include ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering if it shouldn&#8217;t be the reverse, i.e.<br />
tell time machine to &#8220;include&#8221; specific folders (data) and not backup anything else. If the HDD gets hosed, i &#8216;ll reinstall from scratch. The only thing i cant reinstall is my personal data.</p>
<p>How does time-machine gen its backup list ? Is it an exclude or an include ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Alford</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-110991</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Alford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-110991</guid>
		<description>Very interesting tips.  Particularly the cache files.

However, I was wondering about the frequency of changes of some of these files.  Obviously, the Microsoft User Data for Entourage will change daily if not hourly causing a potential huge backup every hour on the hour due to the way the data base is created.  

I would hope if I backed up my system files once that they would not need backing up again for a while until an Apple update was issued.  Same with hopefully most applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting tips.  Particularly the cache files.</p>
<p>However, I was wondering about the frequency of changes of some of these files.  Obviously, the Microsoft User Data for Entourage will change daily if not hourly causing a potential huge backup every hour on the hour due to the way the data base is created.  </p>
<p>I would hope if I backed up my system files once that they would not need backing up again for a while until an Apple update was issued.  Same with hopefully most applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-109453</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-109453</guid>
		<description>Oh, and if you have EyeTV (and you should. It's awesome), exclude the recordings folder. As awesome as I just exclaimed EyeTV to be, the recordings are massive. They're MPEG-2, so it takes like 700MB for a half hour show. And then there's the LiveTV buffer for when you pause it.

Not good for Time Machine. It sort of bleeds storage capacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and if you have EyeTV (and you should. It&#8217;s awesome), exclude the recordings folder. As awesome as I just exclaimed EyeTV to be, the recordings are massive. They&#8217;re MPEG-2, so it takes like 700MB for a half hour show. And then there&#8217;s the LiveTV buffer for when you pause it.</p>
<p>Not good for Time Machine. It sort of bleeds storage capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RYAN SINGER</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-107447</link>
		<dc:creator>RYAN SINGER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-107447</guid>
		<description>You can also exclude alot of invisible items that your installed applications place in your home directory you never knew were there. I'm assuming many of these user specific files are things you could easily set up again if anything terrible ever happened. 

I would suggest if there is a specific program that has the capability to export user settings (ie. ArchiCAD exports/imports xml user settings) that you utilize your customization settings and DO backup the folder that contains them. 

Go to your Home Folder (Command Shift H)
Click on the "Show invisible items" so that it's checked and then 
Select all (Command A) then
Deselect the folders that are important to you (Command Click)

User settings in XML format not only take up less space, but are handy when trying to standardize multiple computers.

(High 5!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also exclude alot of invisible items that your installed applications place in your home directory you never knew were there. I&#8217;m assuming many of these user specific files are things you could easily set up again if anything terrible ever happened. </p>
<p>I would suggest if there is a specific program that has the capability to export user settings (ie. ArchiCAD exports/imports xml user settings) that you utilize your customization settings and DO backup the folder that contains them. </p>
<p>Go to your Home Folder (Command Shift H)<br />
Click on the &#8220;Show invisible items&#8221; so that it&#8217;s checked and then<br />
Select all (Command A) then<br />
Deselect the folders that are important to you (Command Click)</p>
<p>User settings in XML format not only take up less space, but are handy when trying to standardize multiple computers.</p>
<p>(High 5!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-107423</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-107423</guid>
		<description>~/Library/Caches is already excluded (have a look at /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd.bundle/Contents/Resources/StdExclusions.plist)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>~/Library/Caches is already excluded (have a look at /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd.bundle/Contents/Resources/StdExclusions.plist)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-107089</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-107089</guid>
		<description>Very nice. I'll have to revisit this when I pickup my Mac gear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice. I&#8217;ll have to revisit this when I pickup my Mac gear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-105283</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 23:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-105283</guid>
		<description>Interesting list. For most users, excluding the mail databases and ~/Library/Caches should be plenty -- the /Applications tree is going to be mostly static for a conventional Mac user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting list. For most users, excluding the mail databases and ~/Library/Caches should be plenty &#8212; the /Applications tree is going to be mostly static for a conventional Mac user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-105201</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-105201</guid>
		<description>@Cosa

That's kind of the whole point.  Entourage backs up your email as a single file, so ANY activity within Entourage means a whole new backup in Time Machine.  

My Entourage file is several gigs and to be writing that to disk every single hour is going to quickly run your external hard drive out of space.

So instead of leave as much mail as possible on my Exchange server and back the file up manually every week or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cosa</p>
<p>That&#8217;s kind of the whole point.  Entourage backs up your email as a single file, so ANY activity within Entourage means a whole new backup in Time Machine.  </p>
<p>My Entourage file is several gigs and to be writing that to disk every single hour is going to quickly run your external hard drive out of space.</p>
<p>So instead of leave as much mail as possible on my Exchange server and back the file up manually every week or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-105197</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-105197</guid>
		<description>@Ryan Thanks for the quick reply. 

I was unaware that Apple recommended that particular data be excluded. (Steve you make me sad) Still, I would argue that the problem is - if you have alot of data your going to need alot of space to back it up. I still agree with the idea of time machine as a simple all encompassing backup solution. I don't believe that its a good solution, especially for non power users, to just backup less data. But this would be a discussion of if you should exclude data not what you should exclude, which was more the point of your article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ryan Thanks for the quick reply. </p>
<p>I was unaware that Apple recommended that particular data be excluded. (Steve you make me sad) Still, I would argue that the problem is - if you have alot of data your going to need alot of space to back it up. I still agree with the idea of time machine as a simple all encompassing backup solution. I don&#8217;t believe that its a good solution, especially for non power users, to just backup less data. But this would be a discussion of if you should exclude data not what you should exclude, which was more the point of your article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Block</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-105187</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 19:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-105187</guid>
		<description>Sometimes Time Machine backups simply take up too much space, which really sucks. When Leopard first launched, Aperture wasn't compatible and Apple recommended you exclude your Aperture data files from backups -- clearly they understand its limitations as a backup system. People aren't going to just buy drive after drive to make sure they have 100 revisions of their virtual machines saved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes Time Machine backups simply take up too much space, which really sucks. When Leopard first launched, Aperture wasn&#8217;t compatible and Apple recommended you exclude your Aperture data files from backups &#8212; clearly they understand its limitations as a backup system. People aren&#8217;t going to just buy drive after drive to make sure they have 100 revisions of their virtual machines saved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-105185</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-105185</guid>
		<description>I'm going to agree with our benevolent dictator Steve's desicion to backup everything. Excluding files from Time Machine seems to defeat the purpose of what the program is designed to do - store all your backups easily in once place and to restore to exactly the way you had it. It would seem very unapple like to have a backup solution that required you to reinstall all your applications, restore your mail from a different location, and still have to possibly reinstall the OS. Those who want to finely tune what user data is backuped up are much more likely to already have a backup solution. I appreciate the article but would like more cred giving for why the vast majority of users should just let Time Machine do what its going to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to agree with our benevolent dictator Steve&#8217;s desicion to backup everything. Excluding files from Time Machine seems to defeat the purpose of what the program is designed to do - store all your backups easily in once place and to restore to exactly the way you had it. It would seem very unapple like to have a backup solution that required you to reinstall all your applications, restore your mail from a different location, and still have to possibly reinstall the OS. Those who want to finely tune what user data is backuped up are much more likely to already have a backup solution. I appreciate the article but would like more cred giving for why the vast majority of users should just let Time Machine do what its going to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CosaMostro</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-105177</link>
		<dc:creator>CosaMostro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-105177</guid>
		<description>@Jamie-

Careful there! Don't you want to back up your email? There's a database inside that folder that holds all your messages, not just useless cache and preferences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jamie-</p>
<p>Careful there! Don&#8217;t you want to back up your email? There&#8217;s a database inside that folder that holds all your messages, not just useless cache and preferences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Block</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-105157</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-105157</guid>
		<description>Jamie and James, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie and James, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2008/05/good-folders-to-exclude-from-time-machine-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-105153</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=847#comment-105153</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I agree to add the Entourage/Office identities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I agree to add the Entourage/Office identities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
